Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Checking login status…

USERNAME:

PASSWORD:

Logging in…

Logged in as:
.
Logging out…
Inbox My Account Log Out

Ruzhyo

Age/Gender: 21, Male
Location: Sacramento, CA
Job: Army... hooah?

The fruits of all lies rot with time... though the fruits of truth are often born rotten.

Newgrounds Stats

Sign-Up Date:
9/29/04

Level: 8
Aura: Light

Rank: Scout
Blams: 127
Saves: 117
Rank #: 28,401

Whistle Status: Normal

Exp. Points: 560 / 710
Exp. Rank #: 56,669
Voting Pow.: 4.99 votes

BBS Posts: 157 (0.11 per day)
Flash Reviews: 95
Music Reviews: 1
Trophies: 0
Stickers: 0

Entry #1

Newer Older

Jump to Entry: [ 1 ]


Ruzhyo

Hi Thar

Posted by Ruzhyo Apr. 3, 2008 @ 8:50 PM EDT

Well hello thar.

STFUAR.jpg

Log in to comment! | Share this!

The People Have Spoken

8 Comments

Apr. 3, 2008 | 9:46 PM ngfan14 says:

hi, :)

Apr. 3, 2008 | 9:57 PM Ruzhyo responds:

Hi hi. Hihihihi.

General relativity is a theory of gravitation developed by Einstein in the years 1907-1915. The development of general relativity began with the equivalence principle, under which the states of accelerated motion and being at rest in a gravitational field (for example when standing on the surface of the Earth) are physically identical. The upshot of this is that free fall is inertial motion: In other words an object in free fall is falling because that is how objects move when there is no force being exerted on them, instead of this being due to the force of gravity as is the case in classical mechanics. This is incompatible with classical mechanics and special relativity because in those theories inertially moving objects cannot accelerate with respect to each other, but objects in free fall do so. To resolve this difficulty Einstein first proposed that spacetime is curved. In 1915, he devised the Einstein field equations which relate the curvature of spacetime with the mass, energy, and momentum within it.


Apr. 3, 2008 | 10:00 PM Sciutey says:

Lol, nice picture.

Apr. 3, 2008 | 10:04 PM Ruzhyo responds:

Thanks. I made it in Iraq when I was *supposed* to be working instead. Oopz0rz!!!!!!

A coilgun or Gauss gun is a type of projectile accelerator that uses one or more electromagnetic coils to accelerate a magnetic projectile to high velocity. Coilguns accelerate the projectile using contactless means. Coilguns consist of one or more coils arranged along the barrel that are switched in sequence so as to ensure that the projectile is accelerated quickly along the barrel via magnetic forces. Because coilguns have no sliding contact, no wear or erosion occurs to the barrel, and the working life of a coilgun is potentially infinite. It is distinctly separate from a railgun, which pass a large current through the projectile or sabot via sliding contacts. The name Gauss gun is a reference to Carl Friedrich Gauss, who formulated mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic effect used by magnetic accelerators. The term Coilgun refers to the coils of wire forming electromagnets that are used to accelerate the projectile. Some confusion is caused by the use of separate terms. However, there is no difference between a coilgun and a Gauss gun.


Apr. 3, 2008 | 10:43 PM Sciutey says:

What what whaaa?

http://www.funfacts.com.au/squatting-
for-the-olympics/

Apr. 3, 2008 | 10:50 PM Ruzhyo responds:

Fer lerning.

Cordyceps is a genus of ascomycete fungi that includes about 400 described species. All Cordyceps species are parasitic, mainly on insects and other arthropods (they are thus entomopathogenic fungi); a few are parasitic on other fungi. The best known species of the genus is Cordyceps sinensis which gives rise to the vegetable caterpillar, a precious ingredient in Chinese traditional medicines. [1] If a Cordyceps fungus attacks a host, the mycelium invades and eventually replaces the host tissue, while the elongated fruiting body (stroma) may be cylindrical, branched, or of complex shape. The stroma bears many small, flask-shaped perithecia that contain the asci. These in turn contain the thread-like ascospores, which usually break into fragments and are presumably infective. Some Cordyceps species are able to affect the behavior of their insect host; Cordyceps unilateralis for instance causes ants to climb a plant and attach there before they die, assuring maximal distribution of the spores from the fruiting body that sprouts out of the dead insect's body. The genus has a worldwide distribution and most of the approximately 400 species[2] have been described from Asia (notably China, Japan, Korea and Thailand).


Apr. 3, 2008 | 10:56 PM ngfan14 says:

You can't outsmart me. I made a report about Einstein a year ago about his theory of relativity. :D

Apr. 3, 2008 | 11:15 PM Ruzhyo responds:

Indeed ;). Einstein = pwn.

The Six-Day War (Arabic: %u062D%u0631%u0628 %u0627%u0644%u0623%u064A%u0627%u0 645 %u0627%u0644%u0633%u062A%u0629%u2 00E, %u1E24arb al-Ayyam as-Sitta or more commonly Arabic: %u062D%u0631%u0628 1967%u200E, %u1E24arb 1967; Hebrew: %u05DE%u05DC%u05D7%u05DE%u05EA %u05E9%u05E9%u05EA %u05D4%u05D9%u05DE%u05D9%u05DD%u2 00E, Milhemet Sheshet Ha-Yamim), also known as the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, the Third Arab-Israeli War, Six Days' War, an-Naksah (The Setback), or the June War, was fought between Israel and Arab neighbors Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. The nations of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Algeria also contributed troops and arms to the Arab forces. In May 1967, Egypt expelled the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) from the Sinai Peninsula, which had been stationed there since 1957 (following the 1956 Sinai invasion to allow for a free Suez Canal), to provide a peace-keeping buffer zone. In reaction to Israeli-Syrian tensions, Egypt amassed 1000 tanks and 100,000 soldiers on the border, closed the Straits of Tiran to all ships flying Israeli flags or carrying strategic materials, and called for unified Arab action against Israel.[4] In response, on June 5, 1967, Israel launched a pre-emptive attack[5] against Egypt's airforce. Jordan, which had signed a mutual defence treaty with Egypt on May 30, then attacked western Jerusalem and Netanya.[6][7][8] At the war's end, Israel had gained control of the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, eastern Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. The results of the war affect the geopolitics of the region to this day.


Apr. 4, 2008 | 10:31 AM Juanchi says:

Juanchi wasnt here commenting, signed by Juanchi

Apr. 4, 2008 | 12:55 PM Ruzhyo responds:

Freakin liez!!!1!1

The Monty Hall problem is a puzzle involving probability loosely based on the American game show Let's Make a Deal. The name comes from the show's host, Monty Hall. The problem is also called the Monty Hall paradox; it is a veridical paradox in the sense that the solution is counterintuitive. A widely known statement of the problem appeared in a letter to Marilyn vos Savant's Ask Marilyn column in Parade (vos Savant 1990): Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice? Because there is no way for the player to know which of the two unopened doors is the winning door, many people assume that each door has an equal probability and conclude that switching does not matter. In fact, in the usual interpretation of the problem the player should switch-doing so doubles the probability of winning the car from 1/3 to 2/3. When the problem and the solution appeared in Parade, approximately 10,000 readers, including several hundred mathematics professors, wrote to the magazine claiming the published solution was wrong. Some of the controversy was because the Parade statement of the problem fails to fully specify the host's behavior and is thus technically ambiguous. However, even when given completely unambiguous problem statements, explanations, simulations, and formal mathematical proofs, many people still meet the correct answer with disbelief.


Apr. 4, 2008 | 12:29 PM Nikenick says:

I want a long respond!

Apr. 4, 2008 | 12:51 PM Ruzhyo responds:

No. You don't get one. ;)

Perhaps the most significant contribution Freud made to Western thought was his argument for the existence of an unconscious mind. During the 19th century, the dominant trend in Western thought was positivism, which subscribed to the belief that people could ascertain real knowledge concerning themselves and their environment and judiciously exercise control over both. Freud, however, suggested that such declarations of free will are in fact delusions; that we are not entirely aware of what we think and often act for reasons that have little to do with our conscious thoughts. The concept of the unconscious as proposed by Freud was considered by some[citation needed] to be groundbreaking in that he proposed that awareness existed in layers and that some thoughts occurred "below the surface." Nevertheless, as psychologist Jacques Van Rillaer, among others, pointed out, "contrary to what most people believe, the unconscious was not discovered by Freud. In 1890, when psychoanalysis was still unheard of, William James, in his monumental treatise on psychology, examined the way Schopenhauer, von Hartmann, Janet, Binet and others had used the term 'unconscious' and 'subconscious'".[15] Boris Sidis, a Russian Jew who emmigrated to the United States of America in 1887, and studied under William James, wrote The Psychology of Suggestion: A Research into the Subconscious Nature of Man and Society in 1898, followed by ten or more works over the next twenty five years on similar topics to the works of Freud.

Updated: Apr. 4, 2008, 12:51 PM

Apr. 4, 2008 | 7:25 PM Sciutey says:

Wazzap army Intelligence.


Jul. 14, 2008 | 10:01 AM DavidArchuletaa says:

get the fucking rainbow out of the window

Newer Older

Jump to Entry: [ 1 ]